- From: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:12:01 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, w@wja.no, public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
As a final follow up, you might be interested in the new ChromeDriver architecture being mooted. It covers Android and iOS chrome implementations, as well as the desktop one. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FAuPLN92rSinz55J7R3H1hHmmQBuXiO3SUGIeZW1lI0/edit#heading=h.22qi75vmbmqe Simon On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > Thanks David and Simon! > > If we have any additional followups, I will ask Web Events members to do so > on the public-browser-tools-testing list (to avoid cross-posting). > > FYI, Web Events WG is not meeting at TPAC but some group members will be at > that meeting so they may indeed stop by your meeting. > > -BR, Art > > > On 10/15/12 1:15 PM, ext David Burns wrote: >> >> Arthur, >> >> Simon also forgot about the Mozilla implementation[1]. One thing to note >> is that only Opera and Google(Chrome for Desktop only at the moment) have >> official implementations with Marionette[1] catching up on all platforms. >> The rest of the implementations have been done by the open source project. >> >> Representatives from Opera, Google and Mozilla, including Simon and >> myself, will be there to discuss anything further with you. I am hoping that >> other companies will come along and discuss things with us at TPAC. >> >> Thanks for the email and feel free to ask us more questions as they come >> up. >> >> David >> >> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Marionette >> >> >> On 15/10/2012 12:27, Simon Stewart wrote: >>> >>> Hi Arthur, >>> >>> The WebDriver spec is formalising the APIs and workings of the >>> existing webdriver implementations[1][2][3]. That means that the >>> implementations are actually further along than the specification >>> would make them appear. >>> >>> We have two mobile implementations right now: one for Android and one >>> for iOS. Both of these have some level of support for touch events, >>> either through the main "WebElement" API[4] or through the Advanced >>> User Interactions API, the entry point to which is the Actions[5] and >>> TouchActions[6] classes in Java. The test suite for the webdriver spec >>> will be in Python, so we should be surfacing these APIs there. >>> >>> I'd be happy to focus on the parts of the spec that you feel would be >>> most advantageous to your group, so please feel free to ask us to >>> flesh out any sections that you feel are missing. If it would help, >>> I'll be at TPAC from Monday to Wednesday and would be happy to chat at >>> any point (and you'd also be welcome to attend the browser test tools >>> sessions on Monday and/or Tuesday) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> [1] http://selenium.googlecode.com/ >>> [2] http://chromedriver.googlecode.com/ >>> [3] http://www.opera.com/developer/tools/operadriver/ >>> [4] >>> http://selenium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/docs/api/java/org/openqa/selenium/interactions/Actions.html >>> [5] >>> http://selenium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/docs/api/java/org/openqa/selenium/interactions/touch/TouchActions.html >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> The Web Events WG is working on a test suite for the Touch Events spec >>>> [1] >>>> and during a recent meeting, someone asked [2] about the status of the >>>> Web >>>> Driver [3] work by the Browser Testing and Tools WG and I agreed to >>>> followup. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate it, if you would please provide a short status and >>>> plan >>>> for Web Driver including the implementation status of the spec (or a >>>> pointer >>>> to such info). >>>> >>>> -Thanks, Art Barstow >>>> >>>> [1] http://w3c-test.org/webevents/tests/touch-events-v1/submissions/ >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/09/11-webevents-minutes.html#item03 >>>> [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/default/webdriver-spec.html >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: ACTION-97: Report on the status of WebDriver work by the >>>> Browser Test Tools WG (Web Events Working Group) >>>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:26:22 +0000 >>>> From: ext Web Events Working Group Issue Tracker >>>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >>>> Reply-To: Web Events Working Group <public-webevents@w3.org> >>>> To: <art.barstow@nokia.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ACTION-97: Report on the status of WebDriver work by the Browser Test >>>> Tools >>>> WG (Web Events Working Group) >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/97 >>>> >>>> On: Arthur Barstow >>>> Due: 2012-09-18 >>>> >>>> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, >>>> please >>>> update your settings at: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/users/7672#settings >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 19:12:29 UTC