W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2010

Re: More engaging implementation report template

From: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:14:17 +0000
Message-ID: <393b77971002110214j32db7dd9j3079bbc6d8fe80b4@mail.gmail.com>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Cc: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Looks good to me Francois.

Could we use "Implemented" instead of "Pass" in the table? The opposite of
"pass" is "fail" which doesn't really apply since we are saying we don't
expect people to implement all BPs in a single app.

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> Per ACTION-1037, I was to update the implementation report template for the
> upcoming Candidate Recommendation of the Mobile Web Application Best
> Practices specification to explain that we are not looking for "all or
> nothing" implementation reports.
> The result is available at:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template
> I also updated the (currently empty) implementation report in the same
> vein:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report
> Links to these documents will appear in the Status of This Document section
> of the upcoming spec. Let me know if you think something needs to be
> changed.
> Francois.
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 10:14:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:55 UTC