W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2010

Re: More engaging implementation report template

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:18:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4B73D989.2070703@w3.org>
To: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
CC: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks. Good idea. I updated the document with "Implemented" (a refresh 
may be needed).

Adam Connors wrote:
> Looks good to me Francois.
> 
> Could we use "Implemented" instead of "Pass" in the table? The opposite 
> of "pass" is "fail" which doesn't really apply since we are saying we 
> don't expect people to implement all BPs in a single app.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org 
> <mailto:fd@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Per ACTION-1037, I was to update the implementation report template
>     for the upcoming Candidate Recommendation of the Mobile Web
>     Application Best Practices specification to explain that we are not
>     looking for "all or nothing" implementation reports.
> 
>     The result is available at:
>     http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template
> 
>     I also updated the (currently empty) implementation report in the
>     same vein:
>     http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report
> 
>     Links to these documents will appear in the Status of This Document
>     section of the upcoming spec. Let me know if you think something
>     needs to be changed.
> 
>     Francois.
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 10:19:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:03 UTC