- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:29:42 +0000
- To: Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>
- CC: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, public-bpwg@w3.org
Oh come now, Jo. Surely you're looking forward to 2A? Or is it 1AA? Phil. Jo Rabin wrote: > I've posted a new draft [1] in advance of this afternoon's meeting > addressing Eduardo's comments and also adding a note to the Note on > no-transform, which Francois spotted I had missed. > > Diffs from the last draft are linked in line. > > Note that this is draft 1z and z is the last letter of the alphabet. > > Jo > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/100209 > > > On 09/02/2010 08:18, Francois Daoust wrote: >> Just to voice my support to the changes proposed by Eduardo. >> >> The changes in 4.1.5.1 and in appendix K.6 should be done before >> publication. If the group approves of the changes during the call, I'm >> happy to make the modifications myself in Jo's absence so that we >> don't have to postpone the publication by a week. >> >> The rewording of section 1.1 can probably wait for next publication >> and should probably be supervised by Jo as it's all about replacing >> real English with... er... international English that non-native >> English speakers can understand. >> >> Francois. >> >> >> Eduardo Casais wrote: >>> Some editorial comments -- for the sake of legibility and consistency. >>> >>> Section 1.1 >>> >>> "[...] it is out of scope to provide a thoroughgoing solution to control >>> of transforming proxies [...]" >>> >>> Wording? "a thoroughgoing solution to control transforming proxies is >>> out of scope" >>> >>> >>> Section 4.1.5.1 >>> >>> "While complying with this section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header >>> Field Values and 4.2.5 Receipt of Vary HTTP Header Field proxies >>> should [...]" >>> >>> Wording? "these sections" instead of "this section". >>> >>> >>> Section 4.1.5.2 >>> >>> "A proxy may apply heuristics of various kinds [...]" >>> >>> Shouldn'it be "A proxy MAY apply ..."? >>> >>> >>> Section K.6 >>> >>> "[...] and are not included in the IANA registry of HTTP header fields." >>> >>> Consistency with 4.1.5.5: "... and are not included in the IANA >>> registry of permanent HTTP header fields." >>> >>> >>> E.Casais >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Phil Archer Open Media Web http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org/
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:30:16 UTC