W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2010

Re: New CT Draft 1z

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:29:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4B712B06.2020908@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>
CC: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, public-bpwg@w3.org
Oh come now, Jo. Surely you're looking forward to 2A? Or is it 1AA?

Phil.

Jo Rabin wrote:
> I've posted a new draft [1] in advance of this afternoon's meeting 
> addressing Eduardo's comments and also adding a note to the Note on 
> no-transform, which Francois spotted I had missed.
> 
> Diffs from the last draft are linked in line.
> 
> Note that this is draft 1z and z is the last letter of the alphabet.
> 
> Jo
> 
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/100209 
> 
> 
> On 09/02/2010 08:18, Francois Daoust wrote:
>> Just to voice my support to the changes proposed by Eduardo.
>>
>> The changes in 4.1.5.1 and in appendix K.6 should be done before 
>> publication. If the group approves of the changes during the call, I'm 
>> happy to make the modifications myself in Jo's absence so that we 
>> don't have to postpone the publication by a week.
>>
>> The rewording of section 1.1 can probably wait for next publication 
>> and should probably be supervised by Jo as it's all about replacing 
>> real English with... er... international English that non-native 
>> English speakers can understand.
>>
>> Francois.
>>
>>
>> Eduardo Casais wrote:
>>> Some editorial comments -- for the sake of legibility and consistency.
>>>
>>> Section 1.1
>>>
>>> "[...] it is out of scope to provide a thoroughgoing solution to control
>>> of transforming proxies [...]"
>>>
>>> Wording? "a thoroughgoing solution to control transforming proxies is 
>>> out of scope"
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 4.1.5.1
>>>
>>> "While complying with this section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header 
>>> Field Values and 4.2.5 Receipt of Vary HTTP Header Field proxies 
>>> should [...]"
>>>
>>> Wording? "these sections" instead of "this section".
>>>
>>>
>>> Section 4.1.5.2
>>>
>>> "A proxy may apply heuristics of various kinds [...]"
>>>
>>> Shouldn'it be "A proxy MAY apply ..."?
>>>
>>>
>>> Section K.6
>>>
>>> "[...] and are not included in the IANA registry of HTTP header fields."
>>>
>>> Consistency with 4.1.5.5: "... and are not included in the IANA 
>>> registry of permanent HTTP header fields."
>>>
>>>
>>> E.Casais
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 


Phil Archer
Open Media Web
http://www.w3.org/

http://philarcher.org/
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:30:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:55 UTC