W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2010

New CT Draft 1z (was: Re: New CT Draft 1y (was Re: [minutes] BPWG Teleconference 2010-02-02))

From: Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:20:06 +0000
Message-ID: <4B7128C6.5080608@linguafranca.org>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
CC: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>, public-bpwg@w3.org
I've posted a new draft [1] in advance of this afternoon's meeting 
addressing Eduardo's comments and also adding a note to the Note on 
no-transform, which Francois spotted I had missed.

Diffs from the last draft are linked in line.

Note that this is draft 1z and z is the last letter of the alphabet.

Jo

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/100209

On 09/02/2010 08:18, Francois Daoust wrote:
> Just to voice my support to the changes proposed by Eduardo.
> 
> The changes in 4.1.5.1 and in appendix K.6 should be done before 
> publication. If the group approves of the changes during the call, I'm 
> happy to make the modifications myself in Jo's absence so that we don't 
> have to postpone the publication by a week.
> 
> The rewording of section 1.1 can probably wait for next publication and 
> should probably be supervised by Jo as it's all about replacing real 
> English with... er... international English that non-native English 
> speakers can understand.
> 
> Francois.
> 
> 
> Eduardo Casais wrote:
>> Some editorial comments -- for the sake of legibility and consistency.
>>
>> Section 1.1
>>
>> "[...] it is out of scope to provide a thoroughgoing solution to control
>> of transforming proxies [...]"
>>
>> Wording? "a thoroughgoing solution to control transforming proxies is 
>> out of scope"
>>
>>
>> Section 4.1.5.1
>>
>> "While complying with this section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header 
>> Field Values and 4.2.5 Receipt of Vary HTTP Header Field proxies 
>> should [...]"
>>
>> Wording? "these sections" instead of "this section".
>>
>>
>> Section 4.1.5.2
>>
>> "A proxy may apply heuristics of various kinds [...]"
>>
>> Shouldn'it be "A proxy MAY apply ..."?
>>
>>
>> Section K.6
>>
>> "[...] and are not included in the IANA registry of HTTP header fields."
>>
>> Consistency with 4.1.5.5: "... and are not included in the IANA 
>> registry of permanent HTTP header fields."
>>
>>
>> E.Casais
>>
>>
>>      
>>
>>
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:20:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:03 UTC