W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2010

Re: New CT Draft 1y (was Re: [minutes] BPWG Teleconference 2010-02-02)

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:18:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4B711A64.8090204@w3.org>
To: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>
CC: public-bpwg@w3.org
Just to voice my support to the changes proposed by Eduardo.

The changes in 4.1.5.1 and in appendix K.6 should be done before 
publication. If the group approves of the changes during the call, I'm 
happy to make the modifications myself in Jo's absence so that we don't 
have to postpone the publication by a week.

The rewording of section 1.1 can probably wait for next publication and 
should probably be supervised by Jo as it's all about replacing real 
English with... er... international English that non-native English 
speakers can understand.

Francois.


Eduardo Casais wrote:
> Some editorial comments -- for the sake of legibility and consistency.
> 
> Section 1.1
> 
> "[...] it is out of scope to provide a thoroughgoing solution to control
> of transforming proxies [...]"
> 
> Wording? "a thoroughgoing solution to control transforming proxies is 
> out of scope"
> 
> 
> Section 4.1.5.1
> 
> "While complying with this section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header Field 
> Values and 4.2.5 Receipt of Vary HTTP Header Field proxies should [...]"
> 
> Wording? "these sections" instead of "this section".
> 
> 
> Section 4.1.5.2
> 
> "A proxy may apply heuristics of various kinds [...]"
> 
> Shouldn'it be "A proxy MAY apply ..."?
> 
> 
> Section K.6
> 
> "[...] and are not included in the IANA registry of HTTP header fields."
> 
> Consistency with 4.1.5.5: "... and are not included in the IANA registry 
> of permanent HTTP header fields."
> 
> 
> E.Casais
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 08:19:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:03 UTC