- From: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:15:55 -0800 (PST)
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
Some editorial comments -- for the sake of legibility and consistency.
Section 1.1
"[...] it is out of scope to provide a thoroughgoing solution to control
of transforming proxies [...]"
Wording? "a thoroughgoing solution to control transforming proxies is
out of scope"
Section 4.1.5.1
"While complying with this section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header Field
Values and 4.2.5 Receipt of Vary HTTP Header Field proxies should [...]"
Wording? "these sections" instead of "this section".
Section 4.1.5.2
"A proxy may apply heuristics of various kinds [...]"
Shouldn'it be "A proxy MAY apply ..."?
Section K.6
"[...] and are not included in the IANA registry of HTTP header fields."
Consistency with 4.1.5.5: "... and are not included in the IANA registry
of permanent HTTP header fields."
E.Casais
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 20:16:28 UTC