Might as well put on record that I also like the new wording :) ---Rotan. From: Phil Archer Sent: Tue 16/06/2009 10:54 To: Charles McCathieNevile; Jo Rabin Cc: Manrique Lopez; JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA; Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG Subject: Re: MobileOK scheme +1 That matches my understanding absolutely. Thanks Jo. Phil. Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:32:38 +0200, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > >> New Proposed New text (with added oomph): >> >> " The DDC is thus not a target to aspire to, it merely sets a base >> line below which content providers do not need to provide their >> content. It is Best Practice [CAPABILITIES][2] for content providers, >> as well as targetting DDC level devices, also to provide experiences >> for more advanced mobile devices that have capabilities not supported >> by the DDC." >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#CAPABILITIES >> >> Objections? >> >> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Adopt above text for clarification that advanced >> experiences for non DDC devices do not disqualify sites from achieving >> mobileOK, and indeed this is what we'd like them to do. > > I like it. > > cheers >
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 09:56:55 UTC