- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:54:08 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Manrique Lopez <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>, JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
+1 That matches my understanding absolutely. Thanks Jo. Phil. Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:32:38 +0200, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > >> New Proposed New text (with added oomph): >> >> " The DDC is thus not a target to aspire to, it merely sets a base >> line below which content providers do not need to provide their >> content. It is Best Practice [CAPABILITIES][2] for content providers, >> as well as targetting DDC level devices, also to provide experiences >> for more advanced mobile devices that have capabilities not supported >> by the DDC." >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#CAPABILITIES >> >> Objections? >> >> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Adopt above text for clarification that advanced >> experiences for non DDC devices do not disqualify sites from achieving >> mobileOK, and indeed this is what we'd like them to do. > > I like it. > > cheers >
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 09:54:46 UTC