- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:39:15 +0200
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:55:23 +0200, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > I don't think I am clear exactly what your point is. > > Are you saying that experiences that take advantage of higher device > capabilities are not necessarily non mobileOK? I am saying that providing an enhanced experience to more powerful devices is mobileOK (and is recommended behaviour). In other words, that it necessarily is not non-mobileOK to do so. (Breaking things for DDC is nonMobileOK. Improving them for better browsers is mobileOK and strongly recommended). > Surely, if the higher tier experiences are mobileOK they'd also be > provided to the lower-tier devices? No. What is provided to lower-tier devices is restricted in ways that were carefully designed not to preclude providing higher-tier systems with more. > Perhaps this might be a cause of misunderstanding though, and would it > be better if we said: > > It is expected that content providers, as well as targetting DDC level > devices, will wish also to provide experiences that are not necessarily > mobileOK for more advanced mobile devices. No. It would be better if you said It is expected (and encouraged) that content providers, as well as targetting DDC level devices with appropriately delivered content, will enable richer experiences for more advanced mobile browsers. cheers Chaals > ? > > Jo > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile >> Sent: 09 June 2009 19:05 >> To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG >> Subject: MobileOK scheme >> >> In the section on DDC it says >> >> "The DDC is thus not a target to aspire to, it merely sets a base line >> below which content providers do not need to provide their content. It >> is >> expected that content providers, as well as targetting DDC level >> devices, >> will wish also to provide non-mobileOK experiences for more advanced >> mobile devices." >> >> As I understand the Best Practices, they actually recommend providing >> an >> experience for non-DDC devices which takes advantage of their ability >> to >> do more than DDC - in other words, using the additional capabilities of >> more powerful browsers while ensuring that a DDC (or unknown device) >> gets >> content that meets the lowest level of requirements is in line with >> MobileOK, rather than being non-mobileOK as the draft suggests. >> >> cheers >> >> Chaals >> >> -- >> Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group >> je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk >> http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 16:39:59 UTC