RE: MobileOK scheme

I don't think I am clear exactly what your point is.

Are you saying that experiences that take advantage of higher device capabilities are not necessarily non mobileOK? Surely, if the higher tier experiences are mobileOK they'd also be provided to the lower-tier devices?

Perhaps this might be a cause of misunderstanding though, and would it be better if we said:

It is expected that content providers, as well as targetting DDC level devices, will wish also to provide experiences that are not necessarily mobileOK for more advanced mobile devices.

?

Jo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
> Sent: 09 June 2009 19:05
> To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG
> Subject: MobileOK scheme
> 
> In the section on DDC it says
> 
> "The DDC is thus not a target to aspire to, it merely sets a base line
> below which content providers do not need to provide their content. It
> is
> expected that content providers, as well as targetting DDC level
> devices,
> will wish also to provide non-mobileOK experiences for more advanced
> mobile devices."
> 
> As I understand the Best Practices, they actually recommend providing
> an
> experience for non-DDC devices which takes advantage of their ability
> to
> do more than DDC - in other words, using the additional capabilities of
> more powerful browsers while ensuring that a DDC (or unknown device)
> gets
> content that meets the lowest level of requirements is in line with
> MobileOK, rather than being non-mobileOK as the draft suggests.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> --
> Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
>      je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
> http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 18:55:58 UTC