- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:00:41 +0100
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-bpwg <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Jo Rabin wrote: > > Oh, and I am wondering if we need an additional optional section: > > Variation on mobileOK Basic Tests > > e.g. to explain that the 20k limit is for the DDC and that it is often > good practice to go beyond this for more advanced devices I agree. I think this section should be mandatory for each Best Practice that is covered or partially covered by mobileOK, and that a link to the corresponding test definition in the mobileOK spec would be a good idea as well. > On 06/11/2008 17:50, Jo Rabin wrote: >> I think this looks fine, but I am wondering which sections we are >> limiting the document to - I assume that we mean >> >> Relevant Device Properties >> Additional Interpretation of the Best Practices >> Evaluation Procedure (not Test) >> Examples >> >> Only "Evaluation procedure" being mandatory, though I'd have thought >> that Examples would generally be useful? I agree with the list as well, and for a strong SHOULD for the "Examples" section. There may just be a couple of tests where examples may be hard to define, e.g TABLES_SUPPORT: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/mobileOKPro/drafts/ED-mobileOK-pro10-tests-20081021.html#tables_support Francois. >> >> Jo >> >> On 21/10/2008 15:45, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I took an action item earlier today to provide a rewrite of a few more >>> tests for the addendum to BP (aka BP 1.5), which I have done and >>> inserted in Kai's latest draft, and published at: >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/mobileOKPro/drafts/ED-mobileOK-pro10-tests-20081021.html >>> >>> >>> The relevant part is at: >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/mobileOKPro/drafts/ED-mobileOK-pro10-tests-20081021.html#access_keys >>> >>> >>> I have rewritten access keys, auto refresh, avoid free text, background >>> image readability, balance, with the following changes: >>> * used a more compact format, removing the empty "notes to bpwg" and >>> co, >>> * added a "relevant device properties" item at the top of the list, in >>> the light of our discussions on the relation of these evaluations >>> procedures with the DDC >>> * reworded avoid free text, background image, and balance to recast >>> them as evaluation procedure rather than tests >>> >>> (I probably would have substantive comments on some of these, but I >>> tried to keep my changes editorial for the time being) >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Dom >>> >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Friday, 7 November 2008 09:01:18 UTC