- From: Sullivan, Bryan <BS3131@att.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:33:56 -0800
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Jeff Sonstein" <jeffs@it.rit.edu>
- Cc: <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Jeff, One mail per requirement/BP is recommended, we we can address comments on the list. I will do my best to maitain a summary as we go so the final edits are as close as possible. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T -----Original Message----- From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:29 AM To: Jeff Sonstein Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org Subject: BP submission (was: Statistics on mobileOK Basic) Le mercredi 05 mars 2008 à 12:15 -0500, Jeff Sonstein a écrit : > Dan Bogaard and I have some BP recommendations to add which I will be > typing up tonight and submitting to the list tonight or tomorrow > > question for Dom from the newbie: > how do you prefer them?? > > - one email with all BP suggestions > - one BP suggestion per email > - one area-of-practice per email > (possibly) containing multiple BP suggestions I don't have a personal preference (but maybe Bryan, as editor of the BP doc has some?), but I think the one area-of-practice per email approach is probably the most efficient one - it allows one to review the area they are familiar with, while keeping the number of messages to a reasonable level. Dom
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 06:34:42 UTC