- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:06:04 +0100
- To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks again to Rotan for picking up my mistake on the formatting of the Object Element Processing Rule, annoying, especially since I had asked you all to look at it very carefully. Sigh. Festina Lente. So I have spent this morning chastising myself, and (perhaps more usefully) tightening up on the notion of Included Resources and which tests apply to them. This has meant some reasonably substantial (but not substantive) changes. I've also changed the wording of the Object Processing Rule once again to try to clarify it. In addition there is some tidying up of grammatical agreement, capitalization and so on. I hesitate to say this, in view of yesterday's debacle, but please check this all out carefully. It is very difficult to review one's own text and not read into it what one meant to say, irrespective of what it actually says. You will find the latest offering at http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/080704 the diff to the LC-4 Editors draft at http://tinyurl.com/5jgu2q and the diff to yesterday's offering at http://tinyurl.com/5q5lpg Jo On 04/07/2008 00:54, Jo Rabin wrote: > > Oh dear. Thanks Rotan, and I have spotted some other bugs. The fateful > draft 42 to come tomorrow ... when I have thought about it a bit more. > > On 03/07/2008 19:04, Rotan Hanrahan wrote: >> I have looked at the object element processing rule at [1] and I believe >> I can follow what is intended, but unfortunately the indenting (which >> represents the scope of operations in some cases) seems a little broken. >> >> ---Rotan >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08 >> 0703#ObjectElementProcessingRule >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Jo Rabin >> Sent: 03 July 2008 17:44 >> To: MWI BPWG Public >> Subject: New draft of mobileOK Basic 1zo (draft 41) - preview of PR >> draft >> >> >> I've posted a new version of mobileOK Basic Tests at >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08 >> 0703 >> >> Differences from LC-4 Editors Draft: http://tinyurl.com/5bly2q >> >> I intend to make some further minor tweaks to correct punctuation and >> some wording but they can wait. Please review this draft and in >> particular give your consideration to the Object Processing Rule which >> has been such a headache. >> >> Also I think >> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Remove Appendix C >> as it is now superfluous. >> >> thanks >> Jo >> >> >> [principal changes] >> >> Corrections as noted by Francois when posting previous draft into TR >> space. >> >> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in Appendix C >> >> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in section 1 and renaming of >> section 1.1 and 1.1.1 >> >> Corrections to Object Processing and HTTP Response as noted by Dom and >> Francois and as noted by me on the public-bpwg-comment list. >> >> Changes to clarify the difference between type attribute, Internet Media >> >> Type and Presentation Media Type. >> >
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 13:14:27 UTC