W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > July 2008

New draft of mobileOK Basic 1zp (draft 42) - preview of PR draft

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:06:04 +0100
Message-ID: <486E203C.4090708@mtld.mobi>
To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Thanks again to Rotan for picking up my mistake on the formatting of the 
  Object Element Processing Rule, annoying, especially since I had asked 
you all to look at it very carefully. Sigh. Festina Lente.

So I have spent this morning chastising myself, and (perhaps more 
usefully) tightening up on the notion of Included Resources and which 
tests apply to them. This has meant some reasonably substantial (but not 
substantive) changes. I've also changed the wording of the Object 
Processing Rule once again to try to clarify it. In addition there is 
some tidying up of grammatical agreement, capitalization and so on.

I hesitate to say this, in view of yesterday's debacle, but please check 
this all out carefully. It is very difficult to review one's own text 
and not read into it what one meant to say, irrespective of what it 
actually says.

You will find the latest offering at

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/080704

the diff to the LC-4 Editors draft at

http://tinyurl.com/5jgu2q

and the diff to yesterday's offering at

http://tinyurl.com/5q5lpg


Jo



On 04/07/2008 00:54, Jo Rabin wrote:
> 
> Oh dear. Thanks Rotan, and I have spotted some other bugs. The fateful 
> draft 42 to come tomorrow ... when I have thought about it a bit more.
> 
> On 03/07/2008 19:04, Rotan Hanrahan wrote:
>> I have looked at the object element processing rule at [1] and I believe
>> I can follow what is intended, but unfortunately the indenting (which
>> represents the scope of operations in some cases) seems a little broken.
>>
>> ---Rotan
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08
>> 0703#ObjectElementProcessingRule
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jo Rabin
>> Sent: 03 July 2008 17:44
>> To: MWI BPWG Public
>> Subject: New draft of mobileOK Basic 1zo (draft 41) - preview of PR
>> draft
>>
>>
>> I've posted a new version of mobileOK Basic Tests at
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08
>> 0703
>>
>> Differences from LC-4 Editors Draft: http://tinyurl.com/5bly2q
>>
>> I intend to make some further minor tweaks to correct punctuation and 
>> some wording but they can wait. Please review this draft and in 
>> particular give your consideration to the Object Processing Rule which 
>> has been such a headache.
>>
>> Also I think
>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Remove Appendix C
>> as it is now superfluous.
>>
>> thanks
>> Jo
>>
>>
>> [principal changes]
>>
>> Corrections as noted by Francois when posting previous draft into TR
>> space.
>>
>> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in Appendix C
>>
>> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in section 1 and renaming of
>> section 1.1 and 1.1.1
>>
>> Corrections to Object Processing and HTTP Response as noted by Dom and 
>> Francois and as noted by me on the public-bpwg-comment list.
>>
>> Changes to clarify the difference between type attribute, Internet Media
>>
>> Type and Presentation Media Type.
>>
> 
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 13:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:58 UTC