Re: New draft of mobileOK Basic 1zo (draft 41) - preview of PR draft

Oh dear. Thanks Rotan, and I have spotted some other bugs. The fateful 
draft 42 to come tomorrow ... when I have thought about it a bit more.

On 03/07/2008 19:04, Rotan Hanrahan wrote:
> I have looked at the object element processing rule at [1] and I believe
> I can follow what is intended, but unfortunately the indenting (which
> represents the scope of operations in some cases) seems a little broken.
> 
> ---Rotan
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08
> 0703#ObjectElementProcessingRule
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jo Rabin
> Sent: 03 July 2008 17:44
> To: MWI BPWG Public
> Subject: New draft of mobileOK Basic 1zo (draft 41) - preview of PR
> draft
> 
> 
> I've posted a new version of mobileOK Basic Tests at
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08
> 0703
> 
> Differences from LC-4 Editors Draft: http://tinyurl.com/5bly2q
> 
> I intend to make some further minor tweaks to correct punctuation and 
> some wording but they can wait. Please review this draft and in 
> particular give your consideration to the Object Processing Rule which 
> has been such a headache.
> 
> Also I think
> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Remove Appendix C
> as it is now superfluous.
> 
> thanks
> Jo
> 
> 
> [principal changes]
> 
> Corrections as noted by Francois when posting previous draft into TR
> space.
> 
> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in Appendix C
> 
> Removal of reference to mobileOK Pro in section 1 and renaming of
> section 1.1 and 1.1.1
> 
> Corrections to Object Processing and HTTP Response as noted by Dom and 
> Francois and as noted by me on the public-bpwg-comment list.
> 
> Changes to clarify the difference between type attribute, Internet Media
> 
> Type and Presentation Media Type.
>

Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 23:55:26 UTC