Re: ISSUE-230: OBJECTS_AND_SCRIPTS needs to address <object> with multiple children [mobileOK Basic tests] from Dominique Hazael-Massieux on 2008-01-18 (public-bpwg@w3.org from January 2008)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:37:33 +0100
To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1200641853.7038.710.camel@localhost>

r
Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008 à 00:41 -0500, Sean Owen a écrit :
> I don't mind taking that view, but, it seems that when the body of an
> <object> tag, which is the fallback that is rendered when the <object>
> can't be, is at least partially not supported, this should not be
> considered OK any more than if the body of the <object> was a single
> other <object> that can't be rendered.

Yes, I agree; I think Charles' point only applies when the <object>
elements are nested, but not when they are siblings as in my example.

Dom

Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 07:38:17 UTC