- From: Magnus Lönnroth <magnus.lonnroth@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:34:16 +0100
- To: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
I'm not sure I'm interpreting this right, but I think I agree with Dan's text in the issue statement. I like to divide the world into a) applications that run within i standard web browser (context) and b) applications that don't I think BPWG should focus on the former. Standalone J2ME apps (and applets) belong to the latter and can probably best be considered client-server applications. They might happen to use HTTP as a transport, but that's kind of unimportant I think. They might also interact with a browser somehow but I also find that unimportant. I would not call them web applications. Attempting to say anything about apps that aren't constrained by a web browser (i.e. expressed in HTML and JavaScript) seems pretty open ended. thanks, Magnus Lönnroth Head of PDU SDP Development Unit Multimedia Products Ericsson AB > -----Original Message----- > From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich > Sent: den 21 februari 2008 18:02 > To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG > Subject: RE: ISSUE-237 (Define Mobile Web Applications): What > is the definition of a "Mobile Web Application" for the > purposes of BP2? [Mobile Web Applications Best Practices] > > > A web application exposes some sort of interface to the user. > This interface may be an application running in the browser > itself or it > may be an application running on the server, but display some GUI with > which the user may interact. > > Moving this into a mobile context, a web application must run without > any additions, such as plugins or Java. > > -- Kai > > > Please make note of my new email address: > k.scheppe@telekom.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mobile Web > > Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:43 PM > > To: public-bpwg@w3.org > > Subject: ISSUE-237 (Define Mobile Web Applications): What is > > the definition of a "Mobile Web Application" for the purposes > > of BP2? [Mobile Web Applications Best Practices] > > > > > > ISSUE-237 (Define Mobile Web Applications): What is the > > definition of a "Mobile Web Application" for the purposes of > > BP2? [Mobile Web Applications Best Practices] > > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/ > > > > Raised by: Daniel Appelquist > > On product: Mobile Web Applications Best Practices > > > > We have a number of different (but I would say converging) > > views on what constitutes a Mobile Web Application. My view > > is that we are talking about applications for which the user > > interface element executes in the browser/web technologies > > context. I would specifically put device APIs out of scope. I > > would specifically put widgets out of scope. I would > > specifically put non-"web" technologies such as flash and > > silverlight out of scope. Jo has suggested we could use the > > criterion of whether or not the technology uses the > > underlying technology of the DOM to define "Web > > technologies." As agreed on today's call, this is an > > important enough issue to pull out from the discussion on > > scope and give it its own issue. I want to come back to this > > issue on next week's call and take a resolution on this point > > so we can get this out of the way before the next F2f. > > > > Discuss! > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 22 February 2008 07:34:26 UTC