- From: Sean Patterson <SPatterson@Novarra.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:59:58 -0500
- To: "public-bpwg-ct" <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <24889886D84B794A9259323D7354CF33076C61DD@novarrainet2.internalnt.novarra.com>
(Trying to get the LC responses I am responsible for finished up-this is the first of several.) Comment: - the "application/xhtml+xml" MIME type should be the basis for an heuristics that informs transcoders that no transcoding must be applied. The rationale for this is obvious: this MIME type is being used for mobile content virtually exclusively these days Proposed Response: This may be true (I'm not sure), but it is at odds with the "XHTML Media Types" W3C Note (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/) which recommends that the application/xhtml+xml media type should be used for all XHTML documents, not just mobile ones. This media type could be used a clue that the content is designed for mobile devices, but I don't think it should be used as the only piece of information to decide whether content is mobile or not. I believe that we decided at some point to leave specific examples of content types out of the list of heuristics in section 4.3.6 because it was difficult to come up with a list of content types that were specifically mobile. As a side note, it appears most if not all of the content on the w3.org is returned using the application/xhtml+xml content type. These pages would all be recognized as mobile if we recommended this heuristic. (And we all know that mobile WWW users spend large amounts of time reading W3C documents.) Sean
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2008 21:00:40 UTC