- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:06:19 +0100
- To: "Francois Daoust" <fd@w3.org>, "public-bpwg-ct" <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
> (and CSS media queries is a > Candidate Rec, not a Rec) And implementations not exactly thick on the ground. I'm not sure how this helps? I am looking for a way for a content provider to say "This representation is intended for mobile". Media queries doesn't do that, does it. Some think like: <meta name="media" content="handheld" /> would fit the bill. Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] > Sent: 06 May 2008 16:54 > To: Jo Rabin; public-bpwg-ct > Subject: Linking to alternate resources > > Not directly connected to the "confusing" part of the linking mechanism, > but re-reading today's minutes: > > > Link element in HTML requests > >[...] > > jo: exactly, it's a useful mechanism to link to more appropriate > > versions but how can you identify what user-agents THIS version is > > suitable for? > > The mechanism being exactly the same as the one used to link to a CSS > style sheet, user-agent cannot be used for linking to alternate > representations, but CSS media queries should still be part of the > equation with the possibility to define something like: > media="handheld and (max-device-width: 200px)" > > I don't think anyone uses links to alternate representations with that > level of details for the time being though (and CSS media queries is a > Candidate Rec, not a Rec) > > François.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 16:07:11 UTC