- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:35:28 +0200
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Hi all, Re-reading the draft, I noticed the "Requirements" section (§3) is flagged as "informative". But §3.2 contains bolded "should", "may" and "must" key words that reference RFC2119 and are normative. We should probably flag §3.1 as informative and flag §3.2 as normative. PS: Jo, btw, there remains an upper-cased "MAY" in §3.2.3.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 08:36:00 UTC