- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:55:53 +0100
- To: "Francois Daoust" <fd@w3.org>, "public-bpwg-ct" <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
You are right of course. I'm actually unsure that there is a requirement to pick out the bits that are not normative, so it might be best just to remove the bits that say "this is / isn't normative". Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] > Sent: 08 April 2008 09:35 > To: public-bpwg-ct; Jo Rabin > Subject: Normative text in informative "Requirements" section > > Hi all, > > Re-reading the draft, I noticed the "Requirements" section (§3) is > flagged as "informative". > > But §3.2 contains bolded "should", "may" and "must" key words that > reference RFC2119 and are normative. > > We should probably flag §3.1 as informative and flag §3.2 as normative. > > PS: Jo, btw, there remains an upper-cased "MAY" in §3.2.3.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 10:56:39 UTC