- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:02:48 +0200
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
The following is a text proposal to replace the editorial note of "Control by Administrative or Other Arrangements" (§3.2.3): http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080403#sec-other-control "The following restrictions apply for the use of allow and disallow lists: - content transformation proxies SHOULD NOT expect content providers to register for inclusion in and exclusion of such lists, as it is impractical for content providers to know how to register with each one of the existing content transformation proxies. - content transformation proxies SHOULD regularly check their lists are accurate, and refresh them accordingly." I suppose this triggers (at least) the following remarks: 1. this section is supposed to be "means outside the scope of this document", so using normative statements may not be appropriate. And yet, this addresses a real problem. 2. This may better be a Note, but, again, using normative statements in a Note doesn't really make sense. HTH, François.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 09:03:22 UTC