Re: Comments on mobileOK Basic 20070928 draft ( LC-1896 LC-1897 LC-1898 LC-1899 LC-1900 LC-1901 LC-1902 LC-1903 LC-1904 LC-1905 LC-1906 LC-1907 LC-1908 LC-1909)

Johannes Koch schrieb:
> Sean Owen schrieb:
>> On 10/25/07, Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>>> Working Group Resolution (LC-1897):
>>>> Yes, we will clarify that tests should proceed on 1xx (weird as that 
>>>> is)
>>>> or 2xx responses. The last lines of this section indicate that most 4xx
>>>> and 5xx responses will FAIL.
>>> The resolution is about my first issue (carrying out further tests). Is
>>> there another resolution about the second issue (updating the resource
>>> size/count totals)?
>>
>> There was not a change from this point. I believe the text describes
>> the process as intended. The test says when totals should be updated
>> and this implies they are not when the test doesn't say they are
>> updated. I would not want to write lines like "else do nothing".
> 
> I thought it could be consistent as you also note when not to carry out 
> tests. But now it is clear, at least to me.

Hmm, no, it's not clear. That means you have to update totals only for 
main ("under test") or included resources with status code 3xx, 401 and 
407? Not even for 200? Sounds strange to me.

Additionally, 2.4.3 mentions the "resource under test" and "included 
resources", whereas 3.6 says you have to count "included resources". So 
the "resource under test" does not contribute to the "count total"?

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065

Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 20:18:27 UTC