- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:34:17 -0400
- To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: mike@w3.org, public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
On 10/26/07, Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Hmm, no, it's not clear. That means you have to update totals only for > main ("under test") or included resources with status code 3xx, 401 and > 407? Not even for 200? Sounds strange to me. On a success code like 200, you would proceed with tests like PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT, which ask you to count the size of the body and so on. This test condition asks you to add to that count the size of previous responses in the conversation that occurred before that 200, like a 302 or a 401. On an error, you would simply stop before running tests so it is not important. > Additionally, 2.4.3 mentions the "resource under test" and "included > resources", whereas 3.6 says you have to count "included resources". So > the "resource under test" does not contribute to the "count total"? I think the wording isn't quite clear here -- yes the idea is to include the markup, the "resource under test", in the total, but reading it again that is not made clear. Jo I am going to slip in a final editorial change on this too as part of our wrap-up to last call comments and transition to CR.
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 21:34:32 UTC