W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-blockchain@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Agenda for TPAC

From: Boaz Sender <boaz@bocoup.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:00:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHx3Khf0OMLb94mqe9OUr6kXm3GH_SRXn=JmfivDVgXJQ28tKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>
Cc: public-blockchain@w3.org, Marta <marta@blockstream.com>
I'd like to suggest that we add some time to the agenda to identify the
target use cases that the members of the CG want to see work on the web
platform.

>From there we can identify what APIs are missing from browsers and either
bring our use cases to WGs that are working on relevant APIs, or begin to
propose new APIs.

What do you all think?



--
Boaz Sender
Mobile: 1-617-283-2807

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>
wrote:

> Dear BC CG Members,
>
> during todays call we would like to discuss the agenda during the TPAC
> meeting. Here is a draft proposal:
>
> 1. Meet and greet. Who is who in our community group.
> 2. Outcome of the Boston workshop
>    1. Presentation of the Report
>    2. What did we Learn
>    3. What was missing
>    4. Where did we plan to go from there?
> 3. W3C - general information and Blockchain Community Group.
>    1. Who is who is W3C?
>    2. What is the process of becoming an official Interest Group, Working
> Group and whats the difference?
>    3. What other groups are there we should be collaborating with?
>        1. Most of them will be meeting during the TPAC. Lets figure out
> when and join those meetings:
>            1. Digital Assets
>            2. Verifiable Claims
>            3. Web Payments
>            4. Interledger
>            5. World of Things
>    4. What standards W3C writes? What would be exemplary standards we are
> looking for?
> 4. Organization.
>    1. How often should we have calls
>    2. Means of communication - mailing list, slack/rocket/irc, f2f
> meetings etc.
>    3. Proposing agenda items and creating agenda for every call
> 5. Participation - why is there so little activity, how can we improve it
> 6. Organizing next workshop
>    1. When
>    2. Where
>    3. how
>    4. Whats the purpose
> 7. Deliverables
>    1. What should we have in 3 months?
>    2. What should we have in 6 months?
>    3. What should we have in 9 months?
>    4. What should we have in 12 months?
>
> Feel free to disagree:)
>
> Have a great day
> m
>
>
> —
> Security Architect @ Blockstream
>
> mp@blockstream.com
>
> +491703311307 (Germany)
> +14159608938 (U.S.)
> Signal, Wickr (martap)
>
>
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2016 16:01:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:26 UTC