- From: Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:36:35 +0900
- To: Dazza Greenwood <dazza@civics.com>
- Cc: Neha Narula <narula@gmail.com>, Blockchain Workshop <public-blockchain-workshop@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE-+aYLzyCSwRfF3-7TJjTRLFQ5kLc4q7jm9QefT3+OAfOsKXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi. I did using the form (http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1 ) quite time consuming work. how to see the result? On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Dazza Greenwood <dazza@civics.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Based on the discussion so far, here are a couple updates on the position > paper reviews: > > * We are asking all Program Committee members to rate the papers and > expressions of interest on suitability of the topic to be one of the > planned lightning talks and other presentations or focus areas for the > event. > * Please use this form to rate the papers: > http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1 > * We have decided to extend the deadline for review of the papers until > end of Monday, June 13th. > > Thanks, > - Dazza > > > ________________________ > | Daniel "Dazza" Greenwood <http://dazzagreenwood.com/> > | CIVICS.com <http://civics.com/> & Law.MIT.edu <http://law.mit.edu/> > | dazza@CIVICS.com & 617.500.3644 > | Box 425845, Cambridge, MA 02142 > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Neha Narula <narula@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It's time to start reviewing. We are doing this in a fairly informal, >> public way. The list of position statements and expressions of interest, >> with links, is here: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6_TKB3idRR1SJnRA43Euce_P8blPezA3FL7nDxpx8I/edit?usp=sharing >> >> We have more requests to attend than we have space, so we need to >> thoughtfully consider who to invite to attend. Here are the criteria we >> are using: >> >> >> https://github.com/w3c/blockchain/blob/master/position-papers.md#review-criteria >> >> *Please rate as many as you are able to reasonably read and review, with >> the aim of spreading out reviews to cover all of the submissions. * >> >> You can rank each submission on a scale of 1-5, where 1=strong reject, >> 2=weak reject, 3=neutral, 4=weak accept, and 5=strong accept. Enter your >> numerical score in the appropriate cell of the spreadsheet, and if you have >> review comments, enter those as a comment on the cell. >> >> We will average the reviews and sort them, taking as many as we can going >> down the list, depending on capacity. >> >> Please prioritize the non-PC submissions. I have separated out the PC >> submissions at the bottom. >> >> Everyone is using the same spreadsheet; mistakes are inevitable, but >> Command(Control)-Z is your friend (Edit->Undo). That's the beauty of >> operational transforms! >> >> *Please get this done by EOD Sunday *so that we can send out invitations >> on Monday. It is already very late in the game to send out invites. >> >> If you are totally Google-averse and don't have an account send me an >> email and we'll work something out. >> >> Note: If you have not contributed thus far, not submitted anything, and >> don't do any reviews, I might move to kick you off the PC :) >> >> -- >> http://nehanaru.la | @neha >> > > -- Mountie Lee PayGate -- Payment & Money Remittance Service Tel : +82 2 2140 2700 E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
Received on Sunday, 12 June 2016 14:37:25 UTC