Re: Update Regarding Review of W3C Papers

Hi.

I did using the form (http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1 )
quite time consuming work.

how to see the result?


On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Dazza Greenwood <dazza@civics.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Based on the discussion so far, here are a couple updates on the position
> paper reviews:
>
> * We are asking all Program Committee members to rate the papers and
> expressions of interest on suitability of the topic to be one of the
> planned lightning talks and other presentations or focus areas for the
> event.
> * Please use this form to rate the papers:
> http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1
> * We have decided to extend the deadline for review of the papers until
> end of Monday, June 13th.
>
> Thanks,
>  - Dazza
>
>
>    ________________________
>    |   Daniel "Dazza" Greenwood <http://dazzagreenwood.com/>
>    |   CIVICS.com <http://civics.com/> & Law.MIT.edu <http://law.mit.edu/>
>    |   dazza@CIVICS.com & 617.500.3644
>    |   Box 425845, Cambridge, MA 02142
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Neha Narula <narula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's time to start reviewing.  We are doing this in a fairly informal,
>> public way.  The list of position statements and expressions of interest,
>> with links, is here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6_TKB3idRR1SJnRA43Euce_P8blPezA3FL7nDxpx8I/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> We have more requests to attend than we have space, so we need to
>> thoughtfully consider who to invite to attend.  Here are the criteria we
>> are using:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/blockchain/blob/master/position-papers.md#review-criteria
>>
>> *Please rate as many as you are able to reasonably read and review, with
>> the aim of spreading out reviews to cover all of the submissions. *
>>
>> You can rank each submission on a scale of 1-5, where 1=strong reject,
>> 2=weak reject, 3=neutral, 4=weak accept, and 5=strong accept.  Enter your
>> numerical score in the appropriate cell of the spreadsheet, and if you have
>> review comments, enter those as a comment on the cell.
>>
>> We will average the reviews and sort them, taking as many as we can going
>> down the list, depending on capacity.
>>
>> Please prioritize the non-PC submissions.  I have separated out the PC
>> submissions at the bottom.
>>
>> Everyone is using the same spreadsheet; mistakes are inevitable, but
>> Command(Control)-Z is your friend (Edit->Undo).  That's the beauty of
>> operational transforms!
>>
>> *Please get this done by EOD Sunday *so that we can send out invitations
>> on Monday.  It is already very late in the game to send out invites.
>>
>> If you are totally Google-averse and don't have an account send me an
>> email and we'll work something out.
>>
>> Note:  If you have not contributed thus far, not submitted anything, and
>> don't do any reviews, I might move to kick you off the PC :)
>>
>> --
>> http://nehanaru.la | @neha
>>
>
>


-- 
Mountie Lee

PayGate -- Payment & Money Remittance Service

Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net

Received on Sunday, 12 June 2016 14:37:25 UTC