On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Dazza Greenwood <dazza@civics.com> wrote: > * We are asking all Program Committee members to rate the papers and > expressions of interest on suitability of the topic to be one of the > planned lightning talks and other presentations or focus areas for the > event. > * Please use this form to rate the papers: > http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1 > * We have decided to extend the deadline for review of the papers until > end of Monday, June 13th. > I have completed my review, mostly of position papers but I did mark a few others. For next time, a rating system of 1-5 didn’t work well with 3 as neutral. Not enough differentiation between 4 and 5. I’d say change it to 1 as reject, 2 as neutral, 3 as interesting, 4 as soft accept, and 5 as strong accept. — Christopher Allen
Received on Monday, 13 June 2016 21:31:41 UTC