Doug, the question I have is how many position papers do we have until now. In general I think that this questionnaire is a better way - will make it easier to get people through, but if we already have like 100 submissions and now want to get people to resubmit in a form of a questionnaire then I think it is expecting a bit too much from them. Have a good day m — Security Architect @ Blockstream mp@blockstream.com +491703311307 (Germany) +14159608938 (U.S.) Signal, Wickr (martap) > On May 26, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi, folks– > > I put together this questionnaire [1] which I propose as an alternative form of registration, rather than requiring a position statement. > > Please let me know what you think. If you have suggestions, let me know right away. > > If we agree that this is a good approach, we can push this out by the end of the day today, and extend the deadline to next Friday. > > > As a reminder, please help promote this workshop in your circles, especially if you think this form is a better way to get interesting attendees rather than the position statement. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/blockchain-workshop/ > > Regards– > Doug >
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 22:59:10 UTC