W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > February 2020

Re: Next step for biodiversity terms

From: LJ.Garcia <lj.garcia.co@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPZUG=DnZGF-tXJ57mG4i-V++T3kyA9w-5qCgObn4kNbtBed6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Franck Michel <franck.michel@cnrs.fr>
Cc: "Alasdair J.G. Gray" <a.j.g.gray@hw.ac.uk>, Leyla Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
Hi,

I am away this week so please allow me some extra days to have a look to
this.

Kind regards,

On Saturday, February 8, 2020, Franck Michel <franck.michel@cnrs.fr> wrote:

> Dear Alasdair and Leyla,
>
> I was wondering if you had time to check my last reply in issue 309
> <https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/309#issuecomment-576247584>.
> I was suggesting that, if endorsing of the Taxon term by schema.org is
> still gonna take some time, what about trying to move directly to the new
> couple (Taxon, TaxonName) that we have discussed since mid-2019.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Thx,
>     Franck.
>
> --
>
>
> Franck MICHEL - CNRS research engineer
> Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Inria
> I3S laboratory (UMR 7271)
> franck.michel@cnrs.fr - +33 (0)4 8915 4277
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 17:04:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 11 February 2020 17:04:42 UTC