W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > February 2020

Next step for biodiversity terms

From: Franck Michel <franck.michel@cnrs.fr>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 09:50:33 +0100
To: "Alasdair J.G. Gray" <a.j.g.gray@hw.ac.uk>, Leyla Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ab10b954-d152-2b73-0409-e61968220ec8@cnrs.fr> 
Dear Alasdair and Leyla,

I was wondering if you had time to check my last reply in issue 309 
<https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/309#issuecomment-576247584>. 
I was suggesting that, if endorsing of the Taxon term by schema.org is 
still gonna take some time, what about trying to move directly to the 
new couple (Taxon, TaxonName) that we have discussed since mid-2019.

Any thoughts on this?

Thx,
     Franck.

-- 
signature

	Franck MICHEL - CNRS research engineer
Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Inria
I3S laboratory (UMR 7271)
franck.michel@cnrs.fr <mailto:franck.michel@cnrs.fr> - +33 (0)4 8915 4277
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2020 08:50:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 8 February 2020 08:50:44 UTC