W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > November 2017

Re: Single defined term vs plurality of terms (was Protein representation with a Bioschemas context ())

From: Anders Riutta <anders.riutta@gladstone.ucsf.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:04:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJEHyTn+1o1RVv51W4wgN0hZNid_7XXt1JQbxgftB2YnLS+cXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
Hi all,

In a separate message, Alasdair provided some additional context on the two
options:

*Single defined term:* the profile states what is the ontology term to use
> for a specific property. (This is what we are doing with the schema.org terms
> where they exist. Where they don’t exist we are selecting a term from an
> appropriate domain ontology. This does not prevent the data provider from
> also providing other terms, or making same as declarations.)
> *Plurality of terms:* the profile states the name of a property but does
> not state which ontology term to use for it. Each data provider is free to
> select whichever term they see fit. (There is no consistency of markup for
> a protein from one provider to another. Consumers of the markup need to be
> aware of equivalence of terms and make the inference. This is the exact
> opposite of schema.org.)


The "single defined term" option makes the most sense to me.
Anders

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Leyla
>
> On 14 Nov 2017, at 11:03, Leyla Garcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I would also suggest to Governance group to propose a data for voting in
> this matter as, at some point, we have to make a decision. No pressure, but
> it would be great if such decision can be reached before the first week of
> December so it can be included in the poster we will have at SWAT4LS.
>
>
> The governance group have been discussing the fact that we need to bring
> this discussion to a close, but we also want it to have the freedom to
> explore the issues. We were about to draw it to a vote when we reached
> agreement on the direct use ontology terms rather than using the
> additionalProperty mechanism.
>
> The remaining issue now is whether we want a single defined term or allow
> data providers freedom to use whatever terms they see fit.
>
> Let see if we can reach consensus on this, otherwise we will put it to a
> vote.
>
> Alasdair
>
> Alasdair J G Gray
> Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
> Assistant Professor in Computer Science,
> School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> (Athena SWAN Bronze Award)
> Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK.
>
> Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk
> Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872
> Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39
> Twitter: @gray_alasdair
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International
> University of the Year 2018*
>
> Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With
> campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering
> innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and
> the physical, social and life sciences.
>
> This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which
> includes:
>
>    1. Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number
>    SC000278
>    2. Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland,
>    SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee,
>    registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered
>    office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie,
>    Midlothian, EH14 4AS
>    3. Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national
>    performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private
>    limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and
>    registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University,
>    Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.
>
> The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should
> please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any
> attachments) from your system.
>
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:05:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:00 UTC