- From: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:16:08 -0400
- To: "Rees, Kevron" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Cc: Vadim Draluk <vadim.draluk@gm.com>, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>, "internal-autowebplatform@w3.org" <internal-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Vadim. I followed up on your question regarding which small-scale units for fuel consumption such as “Instant Fuel Consumption” we should use in the spec. Hirabayashi-san may be able to offer some vocabulary solutions here. I have also contacted SAE. Based off my research, kWh/100-mi would be a unit of measurement that would work for all cars: electric and gasoline. What I have not been able to answer however, is whether hydrogen car mileage (evaluated as “mpa” or mega pascals), could also be expressed in kWh/100-mi. We’ll need some help with this one. Cindy Lewis On May 16, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote: > Welcome back, Vadim. > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Vadim Draluk <vadim.draluk@gm.com> wrote: >> Team, >> >> >> >> “Better late than never” – I’m back to the office now, and reviewing the >> latest draft. Here are some comments: >> >> >> >> 1. The most obvious one first: UnitsofMeasure interface does not >> reflect the proposal I’ve written up and adjusted according to quite a few >> comments I have received. What’s the plan there? Is it considered not yet >> ready to be included, are we going to have more discussions at F2F? >> > > I didn't know it was ready. That may have been my misunderstanding. > There are two ways we can get it in: you can do a "pull request" on > github with your patch, or I or Justin can merge it in manually. How > would you like to proceed? > >> 2. DriverIdentification: IMO this one has to be substantially >> generalized. Key fob is only one method of identification, and there are >> already other methods deployed, announced or implemented: face recognition, >> Bluetooth, eventually fingerprint and whatever else. A good overall approach >> would be to separate ID type (one of the above) and the actual ID whose >> semantics is determined by the type >> > > So basically an ID type that's more abstract, and a type with several > id primitives? > > -Kevron > >> 3. >> >> >> >> From: Paul Boyes [mailto:pb@opencar.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 9:33 AM >> To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org; internal-autowebplatform@w3.org >> Cc: Vadim Draluk >> Subject: Vehicle Information API Draft Now Published >> >> >> >> The Vehicle Information API draft is now published in the reports section >> here: >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/ >> >> >> >> Please review and send your questions and comments to the group. >> >> >> >> Thanks to everyone who has helped get the specification to this point. >> >> >> Paul J. Boyes >> >> -------------------------------- >> >> Mobile: 206-276-9675 >> Skype: pauljboyes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature >> unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. >> >> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the person or entity >> to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged >> material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use, or taking of >> any action in reliance upon this message by persons or entities other than >> the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received >> this message in error, please contact the sender and delete it from your >> computer. >
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 17:10:33 UTC