W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Vehicle Information API Draft Now Published

From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:44:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFW5wYbUUaCrYNAuyqsAN4UhNLYCDynYKme6qOTbZ+TU39+fzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vadim Draluk <vadim.draluk@gm.com>
Cc: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>, "internal-autowebplatform@w3.org" <internal-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Welcome back, Vadim.

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Vadim Draluk <vadim.draluk@gm.com> wrote:
> Team,
>
>
>
> “Better late than never” – I’m back to the office now, and reviewing the
> latest draft. Here are some comments:
>
>
>
> 1.      The most obvious one first: UnitsofMeasure interface does not
> reflect the proposal I’ve written up and adjusted according to quite a few
> comments I have received. What’s the plan there? Is it considered not yet
> ready to be included, are we going to have more discussions at F2F?
>

I didn't know it was ready.  That may have been my misunderstanding.
There are two ways we can get it in: you can do a "pull request" on
github with your patch, or I or Justin can merge it in manually.  How
would you like to proceed?

> 2.      DriverIdentification: IMO this one has to be substantially
> generalized. Key fob is only one method of identification, and there are
> already other methods deployed, announced or implemented: face recognition,
> Bluetooth, eventually fingerprint and whatever else. A good overall approach
> would be to separate ID type (one of the above) and the actual ID whose
> semantics is determined by the type
>

So basically an ID type that's more abstract, and a type with several
id primitives?

-Kevron

> 3.
>
>
>
> From: Paul Boyes [mailto:pb@opencar.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 9:33 AM
> To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org; internal-autowebplatform@w3.org
> Cc: Vadim Draluk
> Subject: Vehicle Information API Draft Now Published
>
>
>
> The Vehicle Information API draft is now published in the reports section
> here:
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/
>
>
>
> Please review and send your questions and comments to the group.
>
>
>
> Thanks to everyone who has helped get the specification to this point.
>
>
> Paul J. Boyes
>
> --------------------------------
>
> Mobile:   206-276-9675
> Skype:  pauljboyes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature
> unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message.
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the person or entity
> to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, transmission, dissemination or other use, or taking of
> any action in reliance upon this message by persons or entities other than
> the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received
> this message in error, please contact the sender and delete it from your
> computer.
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 15:45:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:53 UTC