- From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:00:01 -0700
- To: "Abramski, Adam M" <adam.m.abramski@intel.com>
- Cc: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Abramski, Adam M <adam.m.abramski@intel.com> wrote: > Meeting Minutes Summary: June Conf Call > > If I made a mistake or forgot something, please feel free to correct me. > There are several AR for *ALL* members so please read through the list and > provide feedback ASAP. Thank you. > > Also, please review Vadim’s proposal sent out today and provide any comments > back ASAP. Thank you. > > Sincerely, > Adam > > Proposed Agenda: > Vehicle Spec related ARs: > > AR: W3C/Alan to get authoritative person to talk to the BG about security of > web apps (DONE – Vadim has written up a some proposed language to cover > security – AR all members please comment on this) > AR: Paul/OpenCar will do a WebIDL check on draft spec before we post it for > the 30-day public comment > AR: Kevron/Intel to propose and add get history method to the spec and ask > BG to comment on it (DONE – AR all members please comment on this it’s in > the latest spec) > AR: Kaz/W3C will provide concrete use cases for having gear ratios for > Transmission Interface to attempt to address this and if need be reach out > to Bart H > AR: Vadim/GM to come up with a proposal on DriverIdentification (DONE) Pull request is here: https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/33 > AR: Paul/Kevron – to remove and make changes to add WheelTicks and > SteeringWheelAngle to the spec (DONE – AR all member please comment on this > it’s in the latest spec) > AR: Paul/Vadim/Kevron – suggestion was to add 2 trip meters per the email to > the spec (AR Kevron will add them shortly) I have a pull request here. Please comment. https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/33 > AR: Hirabayashi/KDDI/Kaz/W3C – create a report with use cases and > changes/additions to the existing W3C Geolocation API spec that cover > Geocoding > AR: Vadim/GM to generate a recommendation (on Availability method – > splitting it into two isAvailableForGet() and isAvailableForSet()) to > include in the spec (DONE – discussed at F2F) > AR: Kaz/W3C to investigate user profile work that was previously done in W3C > but was never completed (DONE – see email from last week) > Vadim/GM to write up a proposal based on Kaz’s feedback to include into the > spec (DONE – neither of the specs identified by Kaz are applicable to > automotive – AR all members please comment on Vadim’s email if you disagree > with this) > AR: Vadim/GM/Aldric/PSA to suggest the data type like float or integer for > each vehicle data element (AR Vadim will send a reminder email on this) > AR: Paul/OpenCar/Kevron/Intel/Justin/LGE based on Vadim/Aldric’s AR above > (ie data types) will modify the spec to match the proposal (AR Kevron will > update the spec to reflect email from Vadim in AR above) > AR: To all - Vehicle Information spec to be completed by June 13th so spec > can finished up and be posted by June 20th for 30-day public comment > > Group Direction > > Timeline laid out to potentially create an Automotive Working Group by > October 2014 > > First Automotive WG F2F meeting to coincide with next Automotive BG F2F in > October (see note below on next proposed F2F) > Discussed how the BG and WG could work together with BG continuing to > explore new spec and reports and WG focusing on driving specs like Vehicle > Information spec to a final official state within the W3C (W3C/Adam – > suggested we could balance the two groups so BG stays focused on creating > use cases and usage reports in specific areas important to automotive (like > the W3C TV Interest Group) and let Automotive WG do the technical due > diligence of creating and driving API specs) > Suggestion to have the BG and WG meeting F2F in October for the first day or > half a day then let the BG and WG split off the next day to drive their own > agendas and discussions > AR: Intel/OpenCar to send email to list to suggest/propose a charter for the > new Automotive WG but allow any other BG member company to step forward if > they wanted to drive the charter and WG with the W3C (DONE – Intel/OpenCar > sent email to the BG list – will wait until 6/18 for another member company > to step forward if not Intel/OpenCar will work with W3C to create a charter > – AR any member interested please speak up) > > Next potential specification/report > > Media Tuner/IVI Radio – most advanced project within GENIVI but we need a > lead or co-leads to move this forward > > Suggestion is to have Pandora lead with help from GENIVI CE EG like Bosch > and Obigo > It would be good to have an OEM take an interest and help as well like JLR > or GM or PSA or BMW > Some information is available publically at: > http://projects.genivi.org/ivi-radio/ > AR: To whoever leads this effort, the W3C suggested also looking at the TV > CG since they are working on a TV Tuner API (Pandora/Craig said they may be > interested in leading this effort – AR I think it would be extremely helpful > to have an OEM like BMW, JLR, PSA, Fiat/Chrysler or GM step up to help > co-lead this) > AR: Intel/OpenCar to ask GENIVI to open up the GENIVI CE EG Media Tuner > project use cases, requirements, source code, etc. so BG could evaluate and > coordinate the two efforts (Adam sent email on 6/11 to GENIVI asking to open > up all information related to this GENIVI effort) > > Navigation – GENIVI LBS EG suggested waiting until Oct this year to check > back on their progress > > GM suggested starting with POI – most everyone agreed that would be a good > starting point for an API spec > Some information is available publically at: > http://projects.genivi.org/ivi-navigation/ > Also see some W3C POI spec draft: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-poi-core-20110512/ > AR: Intel/OpenCar to ask GENIVI to open up the GENIVI LBS EG project use > cases, requirements, source code, etc. so BG could evaluate and coordinate > the two efforts > > Speech > > Intel/Adam talked to Continental/Elektrobit about creating a report with use > cases, recommendations and potential API changes/additions to the existing > W3C Speech Web API spec by the CG > AR: Continental/Electrobit plan to implement the Speech Web API plus > additional APIs to test within GENIVI EG and prepare a report afterwards > (report likely in Fall this year) > Automotive BG will get to review the report before taking it to the W3C > Speech CG > > Other > > Suggestion was made that maybe this group should consider just focusing on > creating use cases vs creating specs and let the to be formed Automotive WG > to focus solely on the creation of API specs > > Next F2F/Upcoming Conf > > Next face to face proposed will be in during the week of October 7 - 10 in > conjunction with the GENIVI All Member Meeting in Ann Arbor, Michigan, > specific dates and location to be determined but will likely be Thurs the > 9th and Friday the 10th > AR: Adam/Intel to bring this up in June’s monthly conf call to give members > a heads up on planning to attend. (AR Adam to add proposed next F2F > information on wiki) > W3C TPAC is coming to Santa Clara this year from Oct 27 – 31 and I believe > Paul and Adam will attend to represent our BG but other members are welcome > as well > > Immediate action items for the group are as follows: > > See ARs from above and drive to finishing them so spec can be published to > the public for a 30-day comment period by June 20th > Set up next face to face at GENIVI AMM on Oct 9th and 10th. ***Please let us > know if you can attend.*** > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 21:00:30 UTC