- From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:13 -0700
- To: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
- Cc: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>, Tina Jeffrey <tjeffrey@qnx.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFW5wYb_5HLGBw0Rf5NkY6f8=Pt+QDGgDW3eyUBvt=ot=a41rw@mail.gmail.com>
Right. The abstract I was referring to was for the data doc. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote: > Keep in mind that we now have two abstracts one for main doc and one for > data doc. > > > Paul J. Boyes > -------------------------------- > Mobile: 206-276-9675 > Skype: pauljboyes > > > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote: > > Thanks Tina and Paul, for bringing me up to speed on the Abstract > status. I will look at it today and post to this thread any > suggestions/revisions. > > Cindy > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Tina Jeffrey wrote: > > > Cindy > > I made some changes to the spec's intro about a month ago. If you think > it needs to be beefed up further that's fine. > > Best > Tina > > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. > *From: *Paul Boyes > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:11 PM > *To: *Lucinda Lewis > *Cc: *Rees, Kevron; public-autowebplatform@w3.org > *Subject: *Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API > > Are you referring to the W3C Vehicle API Creation Guidelines? > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2014Feb/att-0023/W3C_Vehicle_API_Creation_Guidelines_v4.docx > > Paul J. Boyes > -------------------------------- > Mobile: 206-276-9675 > Skype: pauljboyes > > > > > On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you > could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it. > > Thanks, > Cindy > > > On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote: > > Kevron, > > The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html > > > Good catch. Correction made. > > > Paul J. Boyes > -------------------------------- > Mobile: 206-276-9675 > Skype: pauljboyes > > > > > On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> > wrote: > > I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes: > > http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html > http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> > wrote: > > https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28 > > I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access > APIs. We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to > face meeting in Santa Clara. > > I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data > specification, so any help there would be appreciated. > > Any other comments welcome. > > Kevron > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 19:50:41 UTC