W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API

From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:50:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFW5wYb_5HLGBw0Rf5NkY6f8=Pt+QDGgDW3eyUBvt=ot=a41rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
Cc: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>, Tina Jeffrey <tjeffrey@qnx.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Right.  The abstract I was referring to was for the data doc.


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:

>  Keep in mind that we now have two abstracts one for main doc and one for
> data doc.
>
>
> Paul J. Boyes
> --------------------------------
> Mobile:   206-276-9675
> Skype:  pauljboyes
>
>
>
>
>  On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote:
>
>  Thanks Tina and Paul, for bringing me up to speed on the Abstract
> status. I will look at it today and post to this thread any
> suggestions/revisions.
>
>  Cindy
>
>  On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Tina Jeffrey wrote:
>
>
>  Cindy
>
>  I made some changes to the spec's intro about a month ago. If you think
> it needs to be beefed up further that's fine.
>
>  Best
>  Tina
>
>  Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>    *From: *Paul Boyes
> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:11 PM
> *To: *Lucinda Lewis
> *Cc: *Rees, Kevron; public-autowebplatform@w3.org
> *Subject: *Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API
>
> Are you referring to the W3C Vehicle API Creation Guidelines?
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2014Feb/att-0023/W3C_Vehicle_API_Creation_Guidelines_v4.docx
>
> Paul J. Boyes
> --------------------------------
> Mobile:   206-276-9675
> Skype:  pauljboyes
>
>
>
>
>  On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you
> could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it.
>
> Thanks,
> Cindy
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:
>
> Kevron,
>
> The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html
>
>
> Good catch.  Correction made.
>
>
> Paul J. Boyes
> --------------------------------
> Mobile:   206-276-9675
> Skype:  pauljboyes
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes:
>
> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28
>
> I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access
> APIs.  We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to
> face meeting in Santa Clara.
>
> I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data
> specification, so any help there would be appreciated.
>
> Any other comments welcome.
>
> Kevron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 19:50:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:52 UTC