W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API

From: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:16:56 +0000
To: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
CC: Tina Jeffrey <tjeffrey@qnx.com>, "Rees, Kevron" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <15F54420-E00F-4EDC-815B-682FE991D339@opencar.com>
Keep in mind that we now have two abstracts one for main doc and one for data doc.

Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile:   206-276-9675
Skype:  pauljboyes




On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com<mailto:cindy.lewis@me.com>> wrote:

Thanks Tina and Paul, for bringing me up to speed on the Abstract status. I will look at it today and post to this thread any suggestions/revisions.

Cindy

On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Tina Jeffrey wrote:


Cindy

I made some changes to the spec's intro about a month ago. If you think it needs to be beefed up further that's fine.

Best
Tina

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
From: Paul Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:11 PM
To: Lucinda Lewis
Cc: Rees, Kevron; public-autowebplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API


Are you referring to the W3C Vehicle API Creation Guidelines?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2014Feb/att-0023/W3C_Vehicle_API_Creation_Guidelines_v4.docx

Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile:   206-276-9675
Skype:  pauljboyes




On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com<mailto:cindy.lewis@me.com>> wrote:

Hi there,

Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it.

Thanks,
Cindy


On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com<mailto:pb@opencar.com>> wrote:
Kevron,

The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html


Good catch.  Correction made.


Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile:   206-276-9675
Skype:  pauljboyes




On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com<mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com>> wrote:

I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes:

http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com<mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com>>
wrote:

https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28

I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access
APIs.  We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to
face meeting in Santa Clara.

I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data
specification, so any help there would be appreciated.

Any other comments welcome.

Kevron
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 15:17:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:52 UTC