Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API

The data doc abstract is fine. 

I am slightly revising the vehicle doc based off the following outline:
	Description of the Specification
	Goals of API
	Methods of Connection
	Discussion of Issues
	Target Platform
	Typical Use Case

I will paste the revision into this email and you can review. If you find the edits/comments enhance the Abstract, then Kevron can add to the document.

Cindy

On Apr 30, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:

> Right.  The abstract I was referring to was for the data doc.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:
> Keep in mind that we now have two abstracts one for main doc and one for data doc.
> 
> 
> Paul J. Boyes
> --------------------------------
> Mobile:   206-276-9675    
> Skype:  pauljboyes    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Tina and Paul, for bringing me up to speed on the Abstract status. I will look at it today and post to this thread any suggestions/revisions.
>> 
>> Cindy
>> 
>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Tina Jeffrey wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Cindy
>>> 
>>> I made some changes to the spec's intro about a month ago. If you think it needs to be beefed up further that's fine.
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Tina
>>> 
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>>> From: Paul Boyes
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:11 PM
>>> To: Lucinda Lewis
>>> Cc: Rees, Kevron; public-autowebplatform@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API
>>> 
>>> Are you referring to the W3C Vehicle API Creation Guidelines?
>>> 
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2014Feb/att-0023/W3C_Vehicle_API_Creation_Guidelines_v4.docx
>>> 
>>> Paul J. Boyes
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Mobile:   206-276-9675    
>>> Skype:  pauljboyes    
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> 
>>>> Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Cindy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Kevron,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good catch.  Correction made.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Paul J. Boyes
>>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>> Mobile:   206-276-9675
>>>>>> Skype:  pauljboyes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>>>>>> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access
>>>>>> APIs.  We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to
>>>>>> face meeting in Santa Clara.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data
>>>>>> specification, so any help there would be appreciated.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any other comments welcome.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kevron
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>