- From: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:03:23 -0400
- To: "Rees, Kevron" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Cc: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Hi there, Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it. Thanks, Cindy On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote: >> Kevron, >> >> The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html >> > > Good catch. Correction made. > > >> Paul J. Boyes >> -------------------------------- >> Mobile: 206-276-9675 >> Skype: pauljboyes >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote: >> >> I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes: >> >> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html >> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html >> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28 >> >> I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access >> APIs. We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to >> face meeting in Santa Clara. >> >> I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data >> specification, so any help there would be appreciated. >> >> Any other comments welcome. >> >> Kevron >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 00:03:56 UTC