W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Divorcing the data from the Access API

From: Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:03:23 -0400
Cc: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Message-Id: <058786CE-0059-455A-81BB-F934B5D0CA44@me.com>
To: "Rees, Kevron" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
Hi there,

Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it.

Thanks,
Cindy


On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:
>> Kevron,
>> 
>> The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html
>> 
> 
> Good catch.  Correction made.
> 
> 
>> Paul J. Boyes
>> --------------------------------
>> Mobile:   206-276-9675
>> Skype:  pauljboyes
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes:
>> 
>> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>> http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28
>> 
>> I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access
>> APIs.  We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to
>> face meeting in Santa Clara.
>> 
>> I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data
>> specification, so any help there would be appreciated.
>> 
>> Any other comments welcome.
>> 
>> Kevron
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 00:03:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:52 UTC