Are you referring to the W3C Vehicle API Creation Guidelines?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/2014Feb/att-0023/W3C_Vehicle_API_Creation_Guidelines_v4.docx
Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile: 206-276-9675
Skype: pauljboyes
On Apr 29, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Lucinda Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> wrote:
Hi there,
Didn't Tina mention there was more detail in another document? If you could point me at the earlier draft, I will revise it.
Thanks,
Cindy
On Apr 29, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Rees, Kevron wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote:
Kevron,
The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html
Good catch. Correction made.
Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile: 206-276-9675
Skype: pauljboyes
On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote:
I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes:
http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
wrote:
https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28
I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access
APIs. We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to
face meeting in Santa Clara.
I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data
specification, so any help there would be appreciated.
Any other comments welcome.
Kevron