- From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:57:41 -0700
- To: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
- Cc: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com> wrote: > Kevron, > > The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html > Good catch. Correction made. > Paul J. Boyes > -------------------------------- > Mobile: 206-276-9675 > Skype: pauljboyes > > > > > On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote: > > I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes: > > http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html > http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> > wrote: > > https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28 > > I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access > APIs. We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to > face meeting in Santa Clara. > > I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data > specification, so any help there would be appreciated. > > Any other comments welcome. > > Kevron > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 22:58:09 UTC