- From: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:24:59 +0000
- To: "Rees, Kevron" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- CC: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 21:25:29 UTC
Kevron, The normative use cases should probably go with the vehicle_spec.html Paul J. Boyes -------------------------------- Mobile: 206-276-9675 Skype: pauljboyes On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com<mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com>> wrote: I forgot to include live links to my proposed changes: http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html http://rawgit.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/data_spec.html On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote: https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/28 I've got the first merge that separates the data from the main access APIs. We discusses modularizing the specification in the last face to face meeting in Santa Clara. I probably don't have the abstract correct for the vehicle data specification, so any help there would be appreciated. Any other comments welcome. Kevron
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2014 21:25:29 UTC