Re: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

While there is clear consensus to publish in this thread, I have not
seen a formal Cfc mail sent to the list. Can one of the Chairs please
send following example Wonsuk cited?

On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 06:17 +0000, 이원석 wrote:
> Great!
> If we have done this process in short term. I expect Ted and Kaz will
> take care of the rest of the work for official publication of the
> spec! J
>  
> Kind regards,
> Wonsuk.
>  
> From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 3:13 PM
> To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
> Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> spec
>  
> Hi Wonsuk!
> I think I understand. I will do a review now.
>  
> Br
> /pw
>  
> From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:58 AM
> To: Peter Winzell
> Cc: public-automotive
> Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> spec
>  
> Hi. Peter.
> It doesn’t mean the consensus for the specific date. It means the
> consensus for official publication of vehicle signal server spec as a
> FPWD of W3C.
>  
> Below CfC example is from system applications WG. Typically duration
> of CfC is one week but we have rough consensus to go FPWD in the TPAC
> meeting so we might be make the term shorter. One thing you should
> know is W3C only publish the specs in the Tuesday or Thursday of the
> week. It means there is only two days to publish the FPWD of server
> spec in the next week.
>                               
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.
> html
>  
> Kind regards,
> Wonsuk.
>  
> From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:37 PM
> To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; public-automotive <public-automotive
> @w3.org>
> Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> spec
>  
> Hi Wonsuk!
>  
> So, the consensus we are looking for is whether or not the Vehicle
> Service Spec is in a state for publication on Oct 11 ?
>  
> Br
> Peter Winzell
>  
> From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:58 AM
> To: public-automotive
> Subject: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec
>  
> Hi. All.
> In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for
> vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to
> do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this,
> we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon
> as possible.
>  
> Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
> I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today
> or tomorrow!
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Kind regards,
> Wonsuk.
> =========================================
> 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
> 한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
> Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
> E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr
> http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
> =========================================
>  
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Systems Team
http://www.w3.org