Re: Liaising with WoT group at TPAC?

No… I am wrong.  I misread the time.  2pm it is.

Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile:   206-276-9675
Skype:  pauljboyes




On Oct 27, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Abramski, Adam M <adam.m.abramski@intel.com<mailto:adam.m.abramski@intel.com>> wrote:

According to our agenda we’re meeting with the WOT at 2pm this afternoon not 3pm.  Does 2pm not work for the WOT group, maybe I missed an email stating another time vs 2pm.

Adam

From: Paul Boyes [mailto:pb@opencar.com]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:06 PM
To: Heuer, Joerg; public-automotive
Cc: Abramski, Adam M; Dave Raggett; Kazuyuki Ashimura; ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>; Bernard Gidon; Philipp Hoschka; Hund, Johannes; Pfaff, Oliver
Subject: Re: Liaising with WoT group at TPAC?

Thanks Joerg.

All, Please see below for our 3pm.

Paul J. Boyes
--------------------------------
Mobile:   206-276-9675
Skype:  pauljboyes



On Oct 27, 2015, at 12:38 AM, Heuer, Joerg <joerg.heuer@siemens.com<mailto:joerg.heuer@siemens.com>> wrote:

Hi Paul,

thanks for your fast response.

As briefly discussed find attached the link to the current landscape of our group on Security & Privacy led by Oliver Pfaff.
https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Security,_Privacy_and_Resilience

Unfortunately he will attend the TPAC from Thursday on. Maybe there is a possibility for a chat, so I CC’d him.

What might be usefull for both sides is to evaluate your automotive use case along the criteria setup in:
https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Security%26Privacy_Requirements

For each criteria you find a definition linked to it and in
https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Landscape_of_Security%26Privacy_Means

a tech landscape according to those criteria are discussed.

With best regards,
Joerg Heuer

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 03:11:57 UTC