Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??

+1 to this new name as it seems we want to focus on WCAG

WCAG-CT-CG

WCAG Conformance Testing Community Group

I also like the broader term,
ACT CG or (HACT)
(Harmonized) Accessibility Conformance Testing CG

Warm regards,

Charu Pandhi
---------------------------------------
Accessibility Tooling and Automation lead
IBM Accessibility Research
 (512) 286 6370, T/L 363 6370 
Find me on linkedin / twitter
http://w3.ibm.com/able   http://www.ibm.com/able

 VP, SWE Austin, Texas




From:   Emma Pratt Richens <Emma.Richens@bbc.co.uk>
To:     Bryn Anderson <Bryn.Anderson@siteimprove.co.uk>, "Anne Thyme 
Nørregaard" <ath@siteimprove.com>, "Rowsell, Juli-Ann (SSC/SPC)" 
<juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca>, "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" 
<Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, 
"public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>, Wilco Fiers 
<wilco.fiers@deque.com>
Date:   06/27/2018 08:00 AM
Subject:        Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??



WCAG-CT-CG?

WCAG Conformance Testing Community Group

Maybe
-- -- -- 
Emma J Pratt Richens, Senior Accessibility Specialist
BBC D&E UX&D, MediaCityUK, @EmmaJ_PR bbc.in/asg
 
"Open your eyes and then open your eyes again.”

From: Bryn Anderson <Bryn.Anderson@siteimprove.co.uk>
Date: Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 11:03
To: Anne Thyme Nørregaard <ath@siteimprove.com>, "Rowsell, Juli-Ann 
(SSC/SPC)" <juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca>, "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" <
Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, "
public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>, Wilco Fiers <
wilco.fiers@deque.com>
Subject: RE: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??
Resent-From: <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 12:10

+1 for ACT and WCAG to be represented in the name.
 

 
Bryn Anderson
QA and Accessibility Product Expert
 

 
From: Anne Thyme Nørregaard <ath@siteimprove.com> 
Sent: 27 June 2018 10:48
To: Rowsell, Juli-Ann (SSC/SPC) <juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca>; Hall, 
Charles (DET-MRM) <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>; Shadi Abou-Zahra <
shadi@w3.org>; public-auto-wcag@w3.org; Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com
>
Subject: Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??
 
My preference would actually be towards calling this community group 
something with both “WCAG” and “Accessibility Conformance Testing”, to 
both refer to the format (ACT) within which we are working, and the 
guidelines (WCAG) that we are writing rules for. 
 
I think it makes sense to narrow it down to be WCAG specific, since this 
is the one thing that everyone in this community group has in common, 
whether they have a background in automated or manual testing. 
 
Narrowing this community group down to WCAG would also make room for other 
ACT community groups that focus on other sets of accessibility guidelines, 
e.g. for digital publishing, without the ACT CG name already being taken. 
 
 
Best Regards,

 
Anne Thyme Nørregaard
Digital Accessibility Product Expert
 

 
Sankt Annæ Plads 28  |  DK-1250 København K
Mobile +45 23 28 53 91  |  ath@siteimprove.com
 
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn
 
Unsubscribe
 
 
 
From: "Rowsell, Juli-Ann (SSC/SPC)" <juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca>
Date: Monday, 25 June 2018 at 15.20
To: "Hall, Charles (DET-MRM)" <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com>, Shadi 
Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, "public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <
public-auto-wcag@w3.org>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
Subject: RE: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??
Resent-From: <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Monday, 25 June 2018 at 15.19
 
I agree. I think Accessibility Conformance Testing lends itself to a 
bigger scope. 
 
Juli-Ann Rowsell
 
Accessibility Subject Matter Expert, CIO Directorate
Corporate Services Branch 
Shared Services Canada / Government of Canada
Juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca
 
Experte en matière d'accessibilité, Direction générale du DPI
Direction générale des Services ministériels
Services partagés Canada / Gouvernement du Canada
Juli-ann.rowsell@canada.ca 
 
 
 
From: Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) <Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com> 
Sent: June 25, 2018 8:35 AM
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>; public-auto-wcag@w3.org; Wilco Fiers 
<wilco.fiers@deque.com>
Subject: Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??
 
I like the ideas put forth here. From what I have observed, there are 
essentially 2 schools of thought:
Narrow / explicit – WCAG Testing Community Group
Broad / implicit – Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Community Group
 
I prefer the later, as it more closely aligns to the goal and scope of 
Silver to include more than explicitly “web content”.
 
Charles Hall // UX Architect, Technology
 
charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
w 248.203.8723
m 248.225.8179
360 W Maple Ave, Birmingham MI 48009 
mrm-mccann.com
 

Relationship Is Our Middle Name
 
Ad Age B-to-B Agency of the Year, 2018
Ad Age Agency A-List 2016, 2017
Ad Age Creativity Innovators 2016, 2017
North American Agency of the Year, Cannes 2016
Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant, 2017, 2018
 
 
 
 
On 6/25/18, 6:48 AM, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
 
    Note that we will need to formally close this group and start another 
    with the new name. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as we can now 
    probably better describe the purpose and processes of the new group.
 
    I'd also like to throw in the mix: "Accessibility Conformance Testing 
    (ACT) Community Group", to match the name of the related W3C spec and 
    effort. After all, I think we now consider this will be a longer-term 
    group that will pre-standardize (incubate) ACT Rules for AGWG.
 
    Best,
       Shadi
 
 
    On 25/06/2018 13:32, Wilco Fiers wrote:
    > Hey all,
    > Thanks for the great feedback. I've scheduled an Auto-WCAG 
retrospective 
    > meeting next week. This topic is on the agenda. I'd like to come out 
of 
    > that meeting with a poll so that we can do a vote on the question.
    > 
    > Wilco
    > 
    > 
    > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:25 AM Katie Haritos-Shea <
ryladog@gmail.com 
    > <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >     +1 to Makoto!
    > 
    >     On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 1:03 PM Hilera González José Ramón
    >     <jose.hilera@uah.es <mailto:jose.hilera@uah.es>> wrote:
    > 
    >         +1 to Testing-WCAG or WCAG-Testing
    > 
    > 
    >         Enviado desde mi teléfono móvil.
    > 
    >          From my mobile phone.
    > 
    > 
    >         -------- Mensaje original --------
    >         De: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com
    >         <mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com>>
    >         Fecha: 24/6/18 17:07 (GMT+01:00)
    >         Para: Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org
    >         <mailto:public-auto-wcag@w3.org>>
    >         Asunto: Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG??
    > 
    >         +1 to Makoto.
    > 
    >         Jonathan
    > 
    >         Sent from my iPhone
    > 
    >         On Jun 24, 2018, at 2:14 AM, Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
    >         <makoto.ueki@gmail.com <mailto:makoto.ueki@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
    > 
    >>         I like “WCAG-Testing-CG”.
    >>
    >>         “Accessibility” implies broader meaning than WCAG. This CG 
is
    >>         about testing for WCAG.
    >>
    >>         Cheers,
    >>         Makoto
    >>
    >>
    >>         2018年6月24日(日) 2:52 Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com
    >>         <mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com>>:
    >>
    >>             Hey all,
    >>             I had the same experience as Judy. Most people I talk 
to
    >>             about this work is under the impression that we're 
focused
    >>             on accessibility tooling. Even people that know we've 
got
    >>             a broader scope still mostly think of standardising
    >>             accessibility tools as being the primary goal for
    >>             Auto-WCAG. While that's certainly how it started, that 
no
    >>             longer fits with the work that's actually going on. The
    >>             two changes we've made since are these:
    >>
    >>             1. Rules no longer describe test procedures. They tell
    >>             "what" to test rather than "how" to test. In that way,
    >>             what Auto-WCAG is doing is rewriting the WCAG criteria 
to
    >>             be atomic and remove their ambiguities. Rule writing no
    >>             longer is about writing code - how something is coded 
up
    >>             has become irrelevant, as long as results are 
consistent.
    >>
    >>             2. The distinction between what is automated,
    >>             semi-automated and manual no longer exists in rules. By
    >>             keeping "Auto" in our name, this group keeps implying 
that
    >>             the work is mostly about automation, rather than being
    >>             about harmonising test methodologies.
    >>
    >>             I like Gian's suggestion of "testing", so something 
like a
    >>             "wcag-testing CG" or "accessibility testing CG".
    >>
    >>             Wilco
    >>
    >>             On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:27 AM Gian Wild
    >>             <gian@accessibilityoz.com
    >>             <mailto:gian@accessibilityoz.com>> wrote:
    >>
    >>                 I like the idea of using the word “testing” instead 
of
    >>                 auto____
    >>
    >>                 __ __
    >>
    >>                 Cheers,____
    >>
    >>                 Gian____
    >>
    >>                 __ __
    >>
    >>                 *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com
    >>                 <mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com>>
    >>                 *Sent:* 22 June 2018 8:43 PM
    >>                 *To:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org
    >>                 <mailto:public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
    >>                 *Subject:* Rebranding Auto-WCAG??____
    >>
    >>                 __ __
    >>
    >>                 Hey all,____
    >>
    >>                 I wanted to get some thoughts on this. Auto-WCAG 
was
    >>                 originally conceived with the intent to write rules
    >>                 for automated tools, and for semi-automated tools.
    >>                 Those were two separate categories that we'd write
    >>                 separate rules for. With the ACT Rules Format 
evolving
    >>                 the way it did, this distinction has largely gone
    >>                 away. This begs the question of: Should we remain 
the
    >>                 Auto-WCAG community group, or is this name no 
longer
    >>                 representative enough of our work that we should
    >>                 rebrand?____
    >>
    >>                 __ __
    >>
    >>                 I'm curious to hear your thoughts. Should we rename
    >>                 the group, and if we do, what should our new name 
be?____
    >>
    >>                 __ __
    >>
    >>                 -- ____
    >>
    >>                 *Wilco Fiers*____
    >>
    >>                 Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator
    >>                 WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG____
    >>
    >>                 ____
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>             -- 
    >>             *Wilco Fiers*
    >>             Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT 
-
    >>             Chair Auto-WCAG
    >>
    >>         -- 
    >>         -- 
    >>         <以下、署名>
    >>
    >>         株式会社インフォアクシア
    >>         植木 真 
    >>         <ueki@infoaxia.co.jp <mailto:ueki@infoaxia.co.jp>>
    >>
    >>         https://www.infoaxia.co.jp/ <http://www.infoaxia.co.jp/>
    >>         https://weba11y.jp <https://www.facebook.com/weba11y.jp>/
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > -- 
    > *Wilco Fiers*
    > Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair 
Auto-WCAG
 
    -- 
    Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/

    Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
    Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
 
 
This message contains information which may be confidential and 
privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to 
receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, 
disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained 
in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please advise 
the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message.  Thank you very much.
[attachment "image003.png" deleted by Charu D Pandhi/Austin/IBM] 
[attachment "image004.png" deleted by Charu D Pandhi/Austin/IBM] 
[attachment "image001.png" deleted by Charu D Pandhi/Austin/IBM] 
[attachment "image002.png" deleted by Charu D Pandhi/Austin/IBM] 

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2018 14:22:39 UTC