- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:19:42 -0700
- To: "Tom White (MMA)" <lists@midi.org>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJK2wqVd3vQ9DNeLtiO5=Ri4GBLoT07rTE-w8W3qdTvQ6BwqsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Personally, I think a Web MIDI logo would be best if it were as close as possible to the existing MIDI logo, because I think that's at least recognizable. Anything completely new doesn't have any connection in users' mind is going to require retraining them. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Tom White (MMA) <lists@midi.org> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > > If we're going to do a Web MIDI API logo, I personally think it > > should look distinctive and distinguishable from the current > > MIDI logo, or people won't notice the difference. > > > > I also think we should get a logo designer to do it, rather than > > just throw it together. Otherwise, we'll end up with something > > like this silly doodle I made today (see attached). > > Thanks for the doodle... you sure do know how to drive home a > point... I'd do anything not to have your doodle be the logo <grin>. > > I would be inclined to have "MIDI" be in the existing "MIDI" > logotype for consistency, but I agree the overall logo could > be different from existing MMA logos... > > For example, Jeff at scratchdot.com suggested it could be like the > W3C HTML5 logo: > <http://projects.skratchdot.com/web-midi-api/logo/web-midi.svg> > > Another idea would be to make it like the W3C CSS logo. > > - TW > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 00:20:11 UTC