Re: Call for Consensus: retire current ScriptProcessorNode design & AudioWorker proposal

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Alan deLespinasse <adelespinasse@gmail.com>
wrote:

> What about synchronous graph manipulation? Is there a consensus on that,
> and will that be part of the new spec?
>

No, it will not.  In fact, it's explicitly obviated, because you can't get
access to the graph from the script processor's code.


> That is, the ability to modify the node graph (add/remove nodes or
> connections, modify parameters) from the script node callback. Or maybe
> from another timed callback that doesn't produce or consume audio samples
> (presumably also in the worker thread).
>
> As mentioned in yet another bug:
> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/69#issuecomment-24244290
>

The further comments in this thread, and mentioned in that issue, are
reasonable; they'll require a deeper rebuilding of OfflineAudioContexts.
 This is not planned for realtime contexts, though.

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 15:33:47 UTC