Re: Call for Consensus: retire current ScriptProcessorNode design & AudioWorker proposal from Chris Wilson on 2014-08-13 (public-audio@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:29:18 -0700
To: "Srikumar K. S." <srikumarks@gmail.com>
Cc: adelespinasse@gmail.com, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>, Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqX+h7du52K6kv_3-3gNFOBrmeLr_VdCy5OA3zkd7yVAuw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Srikumar K. S. <srikumarks@gmail.com>
wrote:

> In fact, I just realized that to even access “currentTime”, we’d need
> access to the audio context within a worker node .. which the current
> proposal doesn’t provide and therefore playbackTime is not redundant as the
> proposal stands.
>

Indeed.  That's also why the current spec-under-development (
http://cwilso.github.io/web-audio-api/) has sampleRate exposed in the
AudioWorkerGlobalScope - because you can't access the AudioContext.

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 15:29:50 UTC