Re: CfC: Constructors for Web Audio API nodes

I would point out that the proposal in the issue implied constructor
parameters (aside from the context) - I'd like to consider that separately,
because frankly I think they'd be good to have in the factory pattern as
well.  In fact, most of the compactness of the proposed alternate example
comes from that, not from using constructors.



On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Olivier Thereaux <
olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> This is a call for consensus for a proposal described at:
> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/250
>
> The proposal essentially suggests that the nodes in the Web Audio API be
> constructible objects. This would not have any essential impact on the
> features of the API, but would add a syntactic alternative to the create
> methods already existing.
>
> The proposal has been discussed at the 2014-04-17 joint meeting with the
> TAG, with no objection raised.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2014AprJun/0027.html
> http://www.w3.org/2014/04/17-audio-minutes.html
>
> Attendance at the meeting was too limited for a satisfying quorum. I
> therefore invite any member of the WG not present at that meeting to come
> forward with objections to the addition of constructor syntax by next week
> - 2014-04-21.
>
> Any feedback on the proposal also welcome - ideally, please keep
> discussions on the details of implementation to the github page, and
> document any objection or concern in this e-mail thread.
>
> Best,
> --
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless
> specifically stated.
> If you have received it in
> error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the
> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
> immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
> sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to
> this.
> -----------------------------
>