- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:54:00 -0700
- To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 17:54:28 UTC
On scriptprocessornodes in workers - there is a proposal that's been in the issue for a while, that I'd like a temperature check on. I'd like to interactively discuss asynchronicity vs. latency, to understand people's goals; there's a natural tension between async and low latency. On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Olivier Thereaux < olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Dear all, > > This is a reminder that our next teleconference is tomorrow (15th May) at > noon Boston time. Logistics: https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Meetings > > Proposed agenda: > > * Review Action Items > https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/agenda > * Constructors CfC > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2014AprJun/0044.html > * [tentative] Review PRs for promises > (see https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/252) > * [tentative] Review proposal for scriptprocessornodes in workers > (see github issue 113 - Chris, this has been a long-standing todo, > any chance you have made progress recently and we could discuss at the call > tomorrow?) > > > > Best, > -- > Olivier > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 17:54:28 UTC