Re: [Buzzkill] Cleaning Up Web Audio API Spec

On 3 Dec 2013, at 18:31, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:

> The example apps/spatialization section stuff is on my plate.  If you need it in the next two weeks, then perhaps Paul should pick it up.

I’m suspecting we are not reasonably targeting end of Dec for the publication. So, no, not in the next 2 weeks but soon would be good.


> Umm, did I miss a resolution?  The Oscillator definitions are now mathematical.

The resolution to add mathematical oscillators was taken at the meeting on 2013-09-19:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JulSep/1912.html


>  I'm not comfortable with that.

I don’t think the resolution was to make all oscillators mathematical, but to add an option to use mathematical ones. Can you clarify your objection?

Also:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/244


>  Unfortunately, the minutes of that tc were the ones that were lost.

I’m pretty sure all the minutes are listed at http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Meetings

The last 2 meetings were missing from the list (but had been sent to the mailing-list), I just added them to the wiki.

—
Olivier


-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 18:43:28 UTC